Who Owns Sponsored Social Media Content?

Sponsored Social Media Content Ownership

Subscribe to our industry digest newsletter: the latest authoritative marketing news, trends, and stats on social media stars.

Who Really Owns YouTube Videos, Instagram Photos, & Other Sponsored Social Media Content?

Sponsored social media content (i.e. YouTube videos, Instagram photos, Snapchat Stories, and blog posts) can be powerful marketing assets. According to eMarketer, over half of all consumers trust the advice of bloggers when making purchasing decisions, and 60% of YouTube viewers listen to content creators when choosing what product to buy (Google). Determining exactly who owns influencer-created content, however—as well as who has the right to distribute it—can be a confusing component of influencer marketing campaigns.

The Truth About Sponsored Social Media Content Ownership

Many brands believe that, because they conceptualize, script, and fund an influencer marketing campaign, they ultimately own the sponsored social media content (as well as the rights to use it as they see fit). Not true. In fact, it is the influencer, not the brand, who legally owns the videos, photos, Stories, blog posts, and any other type of sponsored content created during/for an influencer marketing campaign.

Digital Star Roman Atwood Collaborates With Scott For A Sponsored YouTube Video

Although Scott helped make Roman Atwood’s YouTube video a success (the video has accrued more than 9M views to date), Atwood ultimately owns the rights to use this sponsored YouTube video on his channel. Because Scott has not included Atwood’s sponsored social media content on any of their digital properties, one can assume that the tissue company chose not to purchase the video’s distribution rights.

Related Post: What Marketers Need To Know About Sponsored Social Media Posts

How Brands Can Use Sponsored Social Media Content

To maximize the impact of content created through an influencer marketing initiative, brands may choose to pay an additional fee for the right to use sponsored social media content on their own brand channels, websites, television commercials, and on other advertising assets. A company may not use an influencer’s likeness or content before acquiring permission first; doing so would violate copyright laws and jeopardize the relationship between brand and social influencer.

The ’90s—vampy lips, chokers and all—are here to stay. @caseyhl91 wearing #AlwaysOn Matte Liquid Lipstick in True Grit. #regram

A photo posted by Smashbox Cosmetics (@smashboxcosmetics) on

Smashbox Acquires License To Use Casey Holmes’ Sponsored Social Media Content

This sponsored Instagram post originally appeared on social media influencer Casey Holmes’ Instagram, and though Holmes’ originally owned the content, Smashbox Cosmetics likely included a stipulation in the influencer agreement that let the company reuse (or #regram) the post on their brand channel.

Related Post: Everything Brands Need To Know About Influencer Agreements

The Vital Function Of Influencer Marketing Agencies

While brands may elect to work with a social media influencer directly, many companies choose to enlist the services of an influencer marketing agency to navigate the legal complexities associated with influencer marketing campaigns. Because these firms are acclimated to working with social media stars and have already established the legal framework to ensure campaigns run smoothly, influencer agencies provide a valuable link between digital stars and the brands seeking to partner with them.

Also See Our Posts On:

Download Our Free Guide To Influencer Marketing Strategy

Which Is Better? Paid Vs. Unpaid Sponsored Social Media Content [Infographic]

5 Ways Brands Can Reach Consumers With Influencer Marketing

How To Avoid An FTC Violation With Sponsored Social Media Content & Campaigns